Howard's design for Democracy without Debate
In classic Orwellian doublespeak, this legislation is known as "Voluntary Student Unionism". ie it will be MANDATORY that the paying of student union fees be VOLUNTARY.
(A bit like Howard's "Unfair Dismissal" legislation which is actually legislation to allow unfair dismissal!)
Why, you ask, is a right-wing Federal Government (Howard's NOT-liberal government) descending from its lofty God-given heights to meddle in the day-to day running of university administrations and thereby jeopardising the provision of valuable character and health building activities and support services?
Why when surely there are vastly more important things to be tackled - like global terrorism, the war in Iraq, nuclear proliferation, world trade globalisation, poverty, racism, indigenous alienation and marginalisation, drug-trafficking, human rights abuse and global warming?
Is he banking on Australian "I'm alright, Jack" laxities to lead to lower levels of funding being available for student political clubs irrespective of the collateral damage to other organisations and services such as those devoted to support, sporting and cultural.
You wouldn't be that machiavellian, would you Johnny? I mean not as machiavellian as you were with "children overboard" and "weapons of mass destruction"?
Is this another rung in Howard's grand design to build democracy without debate, democracy without dissent here in OZ? You know, the democracy without an independant senate, without an independant judiciary and without an independant media.
Wouldn't it be nice if Australian university students would just be good little girls and boys and concentrate on their studies and pay for their own childcare and their own cricket. We don't want our students getting waylaid by long-haired radicals.
Hey, wait a minute...what was our treasurer Peter Costello (and the Clintons) doing in the seventies? Surely, he (they) weren't student activists!
"Dear Representatives of the people,
The VSU bill is being touted as a step towards the "voluntary" and the "democratic" but its promotors have also made reference to student activism.
I cannot, after the last ten years' bruising to my trust and hope, help but think that a desire to stifle one more source of dissent is not ultimately behind this legisation.
It is not only the collateral damage to vital support and social activities that are being placed at threat here but also the very important role that university debate and dissent - of all political persuasions - plays in the building of personal and national values.
It is in that environment - of university-fostered ideas, action and community - that so many of our current leaders - of all political hues - found their inspiration.
If we're serious about true democracy - as well as building well-rounded individuals and a strong nation - isn't it vital, for the sake of the people and the nation you represent that you seriously question and oppose this legislation and its underlying motivations and negative consequences - for all Australians.
Thankyou, Paula Kaye."